I am reading a book right now. I have been reading a bunch of books, actually, one of which I utterly adored and really need to write a proper review of, but right now, I want to talk about The Dream of Perpetual Motion by Dexter Palmer.
Dexter Palmer. This will be important. Give me a minute.
I got this book off of the Goodreads giveaway program, without much more than a glance at the summary because it was steampunk, okay, who isn’t going to spring for free steampunk. Good god, if you just want some good solid serious-business steampunk, don’t read this. Don’t even think about it. Go get The Difference Engine or something. This is not that kind of book.
I actually started to read it a couple months ago, when it first got mailed to me, and I almost immediately put it down, because the introduction was so incoherent and rambling and didn’t even try to make sense. I picked it up again a couple days ago more out of a sense of responsibility than anything else (Goodreads gives you more chances in the giveaway if you post reviews) and it did get slightly more coherent after that, enough that I managed to cover a good bit of narrative ground in between frantic attempts at figuring out how predicate structure worked.
And then, suddenly, out of nowhere:
“And this,” Astrid says, gesturing at a wiry gentleman wearing eyeglasses and a houndstooth suit in need of pressing, standing a little distance away from the rest of the group, looking slightly uncomfortable, “is Dexter Palmer, and he’s a—what?”
“I,” says Dexter Palmer. “Um.”
“He’s a novelist,” Astrid brays, and Harold looks at Dexter, at his right arm rubbing his threadbare left elbow. Harold sees the oaken trunk in the corner of Dexter’s filthy downtown loft with an enormous padlock on it, sees the tens of thousands of pages of handwritten manuscript that fill it. He sees the stub of the tallow candle on Dexter’s rickety wooden desk, purchased for a dollar-fifty at a rummage sale. He sees the short leg of the desk propped up with a seven-hundred-page study of phrenology, printed during the age of miracles. He sees Dexter’s eyes going bad by candlelight, a whole diopter lost with each late night. “Zounds, I am working on my masterpiece,” Dexter Palmer yells hoarsely, disturbing the neighbours. He slings a cup half-full of tepid chamomile tea at the wall, where it shatters.
“He’s writing a novel,” Astrid says brightly.
This is immediately followed by an incredibly long italics-filled spiel from a straw feminist about how science is patriarchal, interspersed with narrative mentions of how on the other side of the party Dexter simply cannot shut up about his novel and I think, honestly, if I did not find the whole thing so bizarrely endearing, I would have to hate this book to a degree previously reserved for Christopher Paolini and Heart of Darkness.
This may not be the best metaphor I have ever come up with, but this novel is what I have decided to think of as Tom Waits literature. Let me explain. Tom Waits has this thing where he writes songs that, by any reasonably objective standard of music, should be incredibly awful. At least half of them don’t even have tunes. He writes lyrics in gibberish faux-German or about men with faces on the backs of their heads, and alternately screams, growls, and mutters them over accompaniments that as often as not consist primarily of banging on whatever junk he had lying around. If anyone else tried this, no self-respecting record label would touch it, but Tom Waits knows exactly what he’s doing and makes no attempt to dress it up for anyone else, and somehow the sheer audacity of it all drags the whole thing out of “nonsense” and into “genius”.
I wouldn’t say Palmer goes that far, but the similarities are there, at least. Perpetual Motion by all rights should be a terrible book. The scenes are disjointed, there’s no indication of an overarching plot besides the fact that the same couple of characters keep showing up, and it simultaneously spells out its themes with the subtlety of a dead cat and makes absolutely no effort to indicate what it’s actually supposed to be about.
But it is, fundamentally, what it is, and it makes no attempt to hide that. It doesn’t try to make you like it, and paradoxically, that makes it a hell of a lot easier to. I can’t in all honesty recommend it; rather like Tom Waits, I’m not even sure if I’m enjoying it or just taken in by the novelty. But it’s certainly an interesting read.